because the truth needs to be told

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Badal fishes out old ace, says will challenge
Re-organisation Act
WSN Network

Chandigarh: Even as the pre-poll promise of removing Clause 5 protecting waters outflow to other states caught Akali Dal-BJP government in a cleftstick, Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal went in for the big kill, announcing his regime will challenge the controversial clause of Punjab Re-organisation Act 1966 itself which enables Centre's interference.

It is this Act which gives the Centre a handle to interfere. If Badal carries out his threat, it will be his second such attempt to challenge a specific section of the reorganisation act before the Supreme Court to correct what is termed by a section of the people as a “historical wrong” committed against the state.

Badal also said the legal validity of the Rajiv-Longowal accord will be re-examined, especially as it stood violated by the then Congress government at the centre.

If Badal challenges the reorganisation act, it will be his second shot at this. In 1979, in his capacity as the Chief Minister, he had challenged sections 78 to 80 of the Reorganisation Act and also the award of river waters announced by Indira Gandhi in 1976. This application was, however, withdrawn from the apex court in 1982 by the Darbara Singh government.

Section 78 of the act says: “… all rights and liabilities of the existing state of Punjab with respect to the Bhakra and Beas projects may be fixed through an agreement by the states after consultation with the central government. If no such agreement is entered into within two years of the appointed day, the central government may, by order, determine the purpose of the projects….” In other words, the central government kept powers with itself to decide the sharing of waters of Punjab and make allocation of the same to other states.

Punjab’s opinion is that section 78 is wrongly added to the reorganisation act of 1966.


4 April
, 2007  
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

     
Google  
 
  Read Also
 
   
  Associated Links
Punjab Reorganisation Act 1966
Rajiv Longowal Accord  

  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
Submit Photo
Submit a Letter  
Submit Feedback

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas