The question whether the authority of Akal Takht
is symbolized in the Jathedar or in the structure has been
nagging the minds of scholars. Many seminars held to resolve the
issue have brought forward a diversity of opinions. Some consider
the Jathedar only a pujari whereas others accept the sovereignty of
the Akal Takht, but don’t accept the SGPC appointed Jathedar. They
propose an alternative way to appoint the Jathedar who is
acceptable to Sikhs all over the world. Some even propose convening
Sarbat Khalsa to resolve the tangle. But they don’t know who will
convene it?
The controversy of Dasam Granth by Gurtej Singh and
Joginder Singh of Spokesman from Mohali again figured in talks of
Sikh Sangat. A group celebrated Zafarnama Divas as a black day
in Sikh history. Baba Harnam Singh Dhuma declared that those
who were trying to challenge Dasam Granth are questioning
sovereignty of Akal Takht. Similar were the views of Akal Takht
Jathedar and others who participated in the ‘Fateh Divas.
A section
of Sikhs regret the fact that the controversy of Dasam Granth was
fanned to disintegrate the very core of Sikhism. The daily prayer (Ardas),
daily recitation (Nitnem), and baptization of Khalsa (Amrit Sanchar)
are deeply rooted in Dasam Granth.
They view that the clamor has no
basis as nobody tried to install Dasam Granth as the substitute of
Guru Granth Sahib. The living Guru for Sikhs is undoubtedly the Guru
Granth Sahib. However, Dasam Granth still deserves some respect. Adi
Granth enjoyed the status of a holy book before being declared as
the Guru of the Sikhs. Guru Arjan Dev ji installed Aad Granth in
Harminder Sahib in 1604. It was anointed Sikhs’ Guru in 1708. For
more than 100 years Aad Granth was revered as a holy book.
Sikhs who
respect Dasam Granth as a holy book say that while Guru Granth Sahib
is the spiritual capital of Sikhs that will guide them through times
of doubt and disturbance,Dasam Granth, however, is a repository of
religious, political, cultural and literary desires of the Sikhs. It
is a testament of Guru Gobind Singh’s trials and tribulations. It
conceptualizes Dharm Yudh by citing from the prevailing beliefs. The concept of divine and demon has been
elaborated. Divine comes to the rescue of those who fight against
the rising authority of demons. But in the process, victorious gods
behave in the same way as demons they were fighting against.
Therefore, Vedas established egoism and racial superiority giving
birth to the curse again.
All verses prepare one to fight and
uphold moral values. Discourses of god and demons have not been
narrated in a flat manner. They have a great symbolic significance
that has been invested with multi-meanings. They show whenever there
is a battle for Dharma, the heroes become oppressor after savoring
victory. God sends another Avatar to settle score with god turned
demon.
The scholars who doubt the authenticity of Dasam Granth
believe that it promotes superstitions, faith in gods and goddesses,
casteism and eroticism. They project ‘Chauvis Avatar’ and ‘Ath
Pakhyaan Charitar Likhyatav’ as highly offensive poetry to the pious
believers. The extramarital affairs of queens, sexual alliances of
princesses, and insatiable desire of beautiful women for
high-ranking men have been given graphic details. The ravenous
hunger for sex outside traditional relationships inspires these
women to weave tales of deception on husbands, fathers and brothers.
All these women are highly influential, self-assured and daring and
deceiving. Some scholars do no believe their Guru can stoop so low
as to appeal to their lower depths.
On the other hand, believers of Dasam Granth
declare that the controversy is not only unnecessary and
meaningless, but also fabricated to create confusion in Sikhs. They
cite the evidence that there is no campaign to replace Guru Granth
Sahib with Dasam Granth. Then, why is there such a panic? When
heroes are prone to repeat demonic behavior, how Khalsa can remain
infallible? Is it not the duty of the Guru to show his Khalsa all
the pitfalls that can swallow them? ‘Ath Pakhyaan Charitar Likhyatav’
according to believers, is to forewarn Khalsa where they might
otherwise end up after tasting victory. They say the debate should
focus more on the world-view of Dasam Granth rather than on the
question of accepting and rejecting it.