because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Cash at a judge's door, but case is closed
WSN Network

CHANDIGARH: After a Sikh judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, called the police when a stranger delivered Rs 15 lakh in cash at her residence, the trail led to another judge with a similar name: Justice Nirmal Yadav.

As the matter became the subject of extensive media reporting, and the CBI also got into it, the probe was abruptly closed and the people were told that there wasn't anything much in the entire episode.

The matter however is refusing to die down.

Now, Anupam Gupta, who was the special public prosecutor for the Chandigarh Administration prior to handing over the investigation to the CBI in 2008, has raised questions over the motive and intention behind CBI's closure of the case.

He is making the hard cash an issue. Taking a dig at the description of Rs 15 lakh as "disputed" by the CBI, Gupta said: "For the CBI to describe this amount as disputed in the closure report appears to be a conspiracy in itself. The CBI's concluding recommendation that Rs 15 lakh be confiscated is astounding."

The fact remains that a judicial officer of the state, an additional advocate general of Haryana, Sanjiv Bansal, had admitted that he indeed had got the cash delivered. "The Rs 15 lakh seized by Chandigarh Police on August 13, 2008 undoubtedly belonged to Bansal as per the interrogation report signed by him," Gupta has said.

The CBI had recommended that the amount of Rs 15 lakh be confiscated as none of the suspects in the case had calimed rightful ownership. However, the signed interogation report of Sanjiv Bansal and co-accused n the case clearly states that the money belongs to him.

Expressing shock at the legal opinion of the then Attorney General, Gupta said: "The Chief Justice of India (CJI) KG Balakrishan; former Atoorney General Milon Banerjee and the CBI have betrayed the nation. The Attorney General to opine that there is no even a shred of evidence that the said alleged offences were committed by Bansal, co-accused Ravinder Singh and Nirmal Singh in conspiracy with Justice Yadav is a shocking travesty of the truth."

A report in the Indian Express quotd Gupta as saying: "For the premier agency, the call details of Ravinder Singh Sanjiv Bansal and Justice Nirmal Yadav are incontrovertible evidence of the close link between Ravinder Singh and Justice Yadav on the one hand and Sanjiv Bansal and Ravinder Singh on the other. How could the Attorney General and the CJI have overlooked the call details and why are the call details completely missing from the closure report even though they occupy such a prominent place in the Gokhale committee report?"

For those fighting for probity in judical domain, the case has moved along disappointing paths.

27January 2010
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Name

Subject
Comment
  Read Also
 
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
 
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
  Submit News
  Submit Announcements
  Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter  
  Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas