because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

India's top judiciary stuck in asset cleft-stick
WSN Network

In times of crumbling moral values in public life, even the top judiciary in India is at a loss about how to save its image, but the insistence of India's top judge about not making it mandatory for top judges to disclose their assets is hardly helping.

Last week, a Karnataka high court judge publicly criticised the refusal to disclose assets, said the Chief Justice of India did not have the rigth to speak on behalf of entire judiciary, and went ahead and disclosed his assets. That is not a dare that has been picked up by many judges.

One of the judges of Punjab and Haryana High Ciourt has followed suit but the pressure is clearly up, and judiciary is looking for a face saving way out of the mess.

Recently, the government tried to push a bill in Parliament that would have allowed the judges not to disclose the assets but it ran into heavy resistance.

The controversy has its origin in a 1997 Supreme Court resolution that all judges would declare their assets to the chief justice. A recent Right to Information application that sought those details was opposed on the grounds that the 1997 resolution was non-binding. It is surprising that judges in India want not to be judged by the same standards with which they judge others. All those desirous of fighting polls in India have to declare in detail their propertiesbut the argument that if judges were to do the same, it will somehow compromise their independence and give material to the grist mills of some angry wayward litigants is not washing down.

Judges of India’s higher judiciary are protected like few others. They self-select their own, and impeaching a judge is so difficult that in Independent India’s history not one has been sacked. The refusal to disclose assets is being seen widely as a refusal or hitch in conforming to the strictest standards of transparency. The standard which is currently being asked of them is not exactly extraordinary; it is merely what is asked of other public figures.

26 August 2009
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Name

Subject
Comment
Google  
 
  Read Also
 
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
 
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
  Submit News
  Submit Announcements
  Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter  
  Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas