because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Death sentence may be changed to life term, suggests India's top court
WSN Network

NEW DELHI: Known for its spasmodic approach on the issue and propelled often by the conveniences of the politics of the moment, India may soon have to take a decision about the death row convicts. While the campaign for removing capital punishment from the statute books remains only a mute voice, there is no dearth of those demanding death for people sentenced by the courts.

The issue is of significant interest to the Sikh community with not just Prof Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar on the death row but also Jagtar Singh Hawara, Balwant Singh and some others.

Now, the Supreme Court has said the government must not sit on mercy petitions of people like Afzal Guru —  sentenced to death in the 2001 Parliament attack case — for too long.

But in remarks that may align the Supreme Court with the latest debate on human rights, it said death row convicts should be entitled to get the sentence changed to life imprisonment.

Settle the issue within a reasonable period of time, ruled a bench of justices H.S. Bedi and J.M. Panchal on Friday. The details of the order were released later.

The court was dealing with an appeal from a Madhya Pradesh man, Jagdish, sentenced to death for killing his wife and five children in 2005.

Saying that human beings must not be used as pawns to further some larger political goal, the bench observed a convict on death row had the right to an early decision on his/her mercy petition.

The bench did not mention any case other than Jagdish’s by name. But it said there were 26 people on death row whose mercy petitions were awaiting decision.

“The condemned prisoner and his suffering relatives have, ... a very pertinent right in insisting that a decision in the matter be taken within a reasonable time, failing which the power should be exercised in favour of the prisoner.”

Reminding the government of its constitutional obligations, the bench said the observations “become extremely relevant as ... in some cases the courts had awarded the death sentences more than a decade ago”.

The Supreme Court had upheld Guru’s death sentence on August 4, 2005. His review petition and curative petition (last legal recourse) were dismissed in September 2006 and January 2007.

The court told the government its failure in taking timely decisions  amounted to a violation of condemned prisoners' right to live with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution.

23 September 2009
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Name

Subject
Comment
Google  
 
  Read Also
 
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
 
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
  Submit News
  Submit Announcements
  Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter  
  Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas