because the truth needs to be told

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Turban Turf War is on 

  Today it is only France but the fear psychosis is gripping the Western world and Sikhs are likely to be sidelined in other parts as well. Once the Sikhs accept the French ban, then turban anywhere will become a symbol of hate. We must guard against that scenario  

The number of Sikh children fighting the right to cover their hair with the Turban is very small. But numbers do not matter. What matters is that the fundamental right has been infringed by an oversensitive state.  While the problems of multi-culturalism in a post-9/11 environment are understandable, still there should be no paranoia over the issue. Sikh thinkers and legal experts have recognized the French situation with respect to the Christian versus Protestant issues, the needs of the Jews and the demands of radical Islam.  However, the Sikh situation is different. 

While it sounds a trifle odd to make comparisons, the Sikh turban is not a fundamentalist move of some elements in the community, but as basic as wearing a normal attire to be acceptable in society.  Today it is only France  but the fear psychosis is gripping the Western world and Sikhs are likely to be sidelined in other parts as well. 

It is disturbing to note that France does not care for international admonition. While France has a strident political position on various international issues, and so it should have, it is ironical that it virtually pooh-poohs European and world opinion about religious tolerance. The US based International Helsinki Federation has denounced religious intolerance of the governments of France in its annual reports for the last many years.

The report of the Federation says that "The trend in the field of religious freedom is toward adopting legislation that increasingly restricts the activities of minority religions to the advantage of the so-called traditional religions”.

Bashy Quraishy, the Vice-chairperson of The Federation of Ethnic Minority Organisations, candidly pointed out that Ethnic Minorities are no threat to the Western identity and welfare system. In contrast to this popular belief, the presence of these ethnic minorities poses no threat to the host nation's identity, culture or religion. This is true he says, because ethnic minorities are diverse and not a single entity, their number is so small that they are no more than 7% of the whole population in any given European country and this insignificant number can hardly be a threat

He further says that the West with its technological advances, mass media monopoly, and economical superiority, is strong enough to withstand any crisis that originates from ethnic minorities.

A very well known Danish politician, with a Jewish background, Mr. Arne Melchior once said in the Danish parliament:

"If a small percentage of Ethnic Minorities in Denmark has the ability to destroy a strong Danish culture, then perhaps this great culture is not worth keeping or preserving".

Megalomaniacs are there in every county and in every community. They are invariably exceptions and not the rule.  The true test of democracy is to face and thwart them and to compromise age-old ideals of a free and fair democratic society.

Sikhs in USA must lobby the office of the International Religious Freedom at the US state department to step up marginalization of France because of its racial policy against the Sikhs there. 

The WSN presents the views expressed by many authorities and scholars on the subject: 

His Holiness The Pope  

“The government cannot be an arbiter in any religious matter. Rather it should respect the dignity of the human person and of his inalienable rights among which his right to adhere, practise and propagate his religion is fundamental. No government should interfere with the inner core of any religion…Secularity is not secularism! It is nothing other than respect for all beliefs on the part of the state that assures the free exercise of ritual, spiritual and cultural and charitable activities by communities of believers.” -- Pope John Paul in a communication to Tarlochan Singh, sent through Monsignor Felix A. Machado, Secretary of Poncciatol Council of Inter-Religious Dialogue. 

Article 27 of the International Convenant on civil and political rights 

“(I)n those states in, which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right in community with other members of their groups, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion as to use their own language.”  

Sikh Forum & Sikh Core Group Delhi Chapter  

“We urge upon the Government of France not to interpret secularism in narrow and dogmatic manner and stand by its commitments to the international community and human rights, respecting different cultural and ethnic identities and combating all forms of chauvinism and xenophobia.”  

“It was the French Revolution in 1789 that had first talked of ‘rights of man’ and even the 1958 French Constitution was explicit when it said that it would ensure equality of all citizens before law without discrimination by origin, race or religion. It shall respect all beliefs. I am sure the French President will look into the issue of turban in a comprehensive manner and not just legally.” Dr. MS Gill, India’s former Chief Election Commissioner and now a federal law maker in the Upper House 

Lord Slynn of Hadley, an eminent jurist 

The French law is to say the least “silly” and it “violated the human rights” of individuals and should be challenged. “In England, we would never make such silly laws.” Several European countries had allowed the Sikhs to wear the turbans and had even amended their local laws to accommodate the religious sentiments of this community. The Turban is the Crowning Glory of the Sikhs.  It makes the Sikh an integral part of the Sikh Commonwealth.   

Nicholas Berdyaeuv, a celebrated Christian thinker 

Without the turban, the Sikh loses his self.  The attempts to de-turbanise the Sikhs would amount to a repudiation of their glorious heritage. The Sikh turban is an inheritance Sikhs cannot do without. 

Darshan Singh Maini, Sikh litterateur 

“According to the Sikh philosophy of “a physically complete man”, the human being must preserve all the hair on his head and face as an essential part of his nature. Just as the skull is protective of the brain, the hair, as an inseparable part of the skull, ensures the elan vital of a human being.”

23 January 2008
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
  Religious intolerance in Europe
  Turbanating the issue
  Sarkozy fails to cozy up to Sikhs
  The French and the Sikh approach to
  Turbans now OK at Costa Mesa bar
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
  Denmark Sikh loses kirpan battle

  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter    
  Submit Feedback
 

s
 

a

 

 

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas