|
Catastrophe is coming
Via
Sehajdhari Route
Gurcharanjit
Singh Lamba
| |
The SGPC in
1973 recorded that when the Sikh Gurdwara Act 1925 was enacted,
there were some Sehajdhari Sikhs in some districts of Punjab but
after partition of the country, this institution of Sehajdhari
has virtually ceased to exist. It said Sehajdhari idea was being
misused to enlist non-Sikhs as voters. It asked the Govt of
India to include only keshadhari Sikhs as voters. Now, what new
wisdom has dawned? |
|

It is not a
simple resolution or decision of the SGPC. It is a question about
the future of the entire Panth and Panthic
institutions.
This affidavit
casts a big aspersion on the working of the SGPC. How one or two
individuals can overturn the gurmatas and can take the apex
body, its general house and its executive body, for a ride.
Even the entire
Panth cannot change the requirements and requisites of the five
Kakars (including kesh) or four Kurahits.
SGPC or any of
its officials is not competent to take a decision on the basic
postulates of the Sikh panth.
But the sad
reality is, that it has happened.
|
29.09.2008
|
HC directs
SGPC to answer, Whether or not a person who cuts his hair
and/or shaves his beard is a “Sehajdhari Sikh”? |
|
22.11.2008 |
SGPC resolves
to constitute a Committee of Scholars/Legal experts and
Representatives of the SGPC to give an opinion based upon
historical, theological and philosophical perspective. |
|
26.11.2008 |
Expert Panel
meets in Chandigarh and recommends to SGPC that the 1938
resolution fixing qualification of a Sehajdhari be adopted. |
|
03.12.2008 |
SGPC
Executive decides,
“A
person cannot claim to be a Sehajdhari by trimming/cutting
his/her hair, beard or eyebrows in any manner”. |
|
04.12.2008 |
Expert Panel
meets at Amritsar and confirms the SGPC Executive resolution of
03.12.2008. |
|
05.12.2008 |
SGPC files
affidavit in the High Court saying, “Once a Sahajdhari
becomes a Keshadhari Sikh, he under no circumstances by
cutting/trimming his/her hair, beard, eye-brows in any manner
can claim to be a Sahajdhari Sikh.” |
KESH.
Every person keeping hair is not a Sikh but there cannot
be a Sikh without kesh. When a Sikh shears his
hair he rather breaks his relation and linkage with Guru Nanak Dev
ji.
Maharaja Dalip
Singh was too young when he was taken under the tutelage of the
Britishers. At Kolkata he was converted to Christianity. Still his
turban and kesh were not removed. It was after one year that
when his kesh were removed, E. Dalhousie Login remarked,
He had been long
anxious to show that he was no longer a follower of Nanuk, he Sikh
Prophet, by cutting off the long tress of hair which he, in common
with all Sikhs, wore twisted up into a knot above the forehead and
covered with the bright-coloured turban.
(Lady Login’s
Recollections by E. Dalhouse Login)
But later on
realizing what had been done to him, Dalip Singh wrote a letter on
25th March, 1886 from London to the Khalsa of Punjab
saying,
My
beloved countrymen,
………I now,
therefore, beg forgiveness of you, Khalsa Jee, or the Pure for
having forsaken the faith of my ancestors for a foreign religion,
but I was very young when I embraced Christianity.
It is my fond
desire on reaching Bombay to take the Pahul gain, and I sincerely
hope for your prayers to the Sutgooroo on that solemn occasion….
Your own flesh and blood
Duleep Singh
‘Sehajdhari
Sikh’
There is no mention of the term Sehajdhari Sikh in Guru
Granth Sahib, Dasam Granth, Sikh Rahit Maryada, Delhi Sikh Gurdwara
Act or even the acts governing Takhat Sri Hazur Sahib or Takhat Sri
Patna Sahib. Sikh Gurdwara Act when introduced in 1925 also made no
mention of this term. In the year 1959 Section 2(10-A) was inserted
in the Act vide Section 3(4) of the Punjab Act No. 1 of 1959. (Law
of Religious Institutions by Dr. Kashmir Singh).
It is a known fact that in every election to the SGPC this
term has been misused by corrupt and unscrupulous elements to
infiltrate into the apex body.
In pre-partition days in certain areas of
West Punjab there
were some people who believed only in Guru Granth Sahib and
Gurdwaras. At that time certain facilities were given to the Sikhs
by the Government and Sehajdhari Sikhs were also entitled for
those. SGPC was issuing the certificate of Sehajdhari. These
Sehajdharis were following and observing all the ceremonies
according to Sikh rites only. They felt pride in calling themselves
Sehajdharis.
Bhai Kahn Singh in his magnum opus Mahan Kosh defines
that Sehajdhari Sikhs are those who do not keep the rahit
of kachhahra and kirpan. According to Bhai Kahn
Singh the Sehajdharis too are not exempt from the rahit
of keshas.
Khushwant Singh
aptly notes the requirements of a Sikh,
…………..It proves that the sense of belonging to the Sikh community
requires both the belief in the teachings of the Adi Granth and the
observance of the Khalsa tradition initiated by Guru Gobind Singh;
and that there is no such thing as a clean-shaven Sikh - he is
simply a Hindu believing in Sikhism.
(A History of the Sikhs – Khushwant Singh
p.305)
Identity and entity of the Sikhs are interdependent. Five
kakars of a Sikh are an inseparable part of his body. A
section of the power-wielding elements’ hatred towards Sikhi
saroop is blatantly unconcealed
Shiromani Gurdwara
Prabandhak Committee in its meeting on 12th May, 1938 had
the occasion to define a Sehajdhari. It decided that a person
claiming to be a Sehajdhari must fulfill five conditions,
namely, (1) Should keep beard, (2) Should not use barber’s razor,
(3) Should make at least one of his children a Singh, (4) Should
observe all rites in accordance with gurmat, and (5) Should
not consume tobacco.
Before partition these Sehajdharis used to call
themselves Sikhs but immediately after partition these very
people branded Sikhs as Keshadhari Hindus. Hatred of
this section finds its genesis in the philosophy and writings of
Swami Dayanand Saraswati, founder of Arya Samaj. Swami Dayanand was
candid in ridiculing the kakars given by Guru Gobind Singh ji.
Writing in Satyarth Parkash that as vaam makaris have
five makars, namely meen, maithun, madira, mudra and
maans i.e. fish, sex, wine, dance and meat, Guru Gobind Singh
introduced five kakars. He did not stop here and went
further to offer unsolicited suggestion that these kakars
were given by Guru Gobind Singh for that particular time and there
is no usefulness or purpose of keeping these now.
Sadly this was not a remark in isolation. On
25th
June, 1963 while speaking in Kolkata. Vinobha Bhave, the bhoodan
leader had the audacity to ridicule kirpan, asking what
is the significance of this now.
On
11th November, 1963 while speaking at a gurpurab
at Delhi, the then Union Health Minister Dr. Sushila Nayyar mocked
at the very identity of the Sikhs and said the purpose for which
Sikhism was created had been fulfilled, then what was the need of
the Sikhs. Master Tara Singh’s strong rebuttal at that time had
silenced her.
Mahatma Gandhi’s
oft-referred remarks against Guru Gobind Singh ji that he was a
misguided patriot left deep scars on the psyche of the Sikhs.
These remarks
and observations may be innocuous or innocent but the subjects of
this great nation atleast expect from its rulers that their feelings
and sensibilities are honoured.
Sardar Saran Singh, Editor of Sikh Review’s remarks
are pertinent and echo the feelings of the panth that our
only demand is that we be allowed to live in this saroop.
At the time of partition in 1947, visionary Master Tara
Singh lamented that when the Britishers were leaving, he was
frightened. He said till now any Sikh, even the worst type of
a traitor could not claim to be an angrez, but now it would
take only two minutes for him to join the bandwagon of ruling
class. How prophetic he was has been proved beyond doubt.
It is too well
known that during the British period observance of the Sikh Rahit
was mandatory. Giving reference of this SGPC on 22nd
February, 1941 demanded from Punjab Government to ensure that this
rahit was observed by the Sikhs in Punjab Police too.
But after
partition everything was reversed and trimming and descration of the
keshas became so copious that SGPC on 28th March,
1965 demanded from Government of India that trimming or shearing of
keshas be strictly prohibited in the Army too. This demand of the
SGPC was accepted by the Government of India and a notification to
this effect was issued by the Army Headquarters in the year 1986.
It is a matter of fact that the tornado of Partition brought
one big change. This was noted and recorded by SGPC in its General
House meeting of 1973 which said that at the time of enactment of
the 1925 Act, there were some Sehajdhari Sikhs in some
districts of
Punjab who fulfilled the required qualifications laid down in the Sikh Gurdwara
Act. However, after partition of the country this institution of
Sehajdhari Sikhs has virtually ceased to exist. Of these
Sehajdhari Sikhs some have become Singhs and some have fallen
back to the fold of Hindu culture. It further noted that this route
is now being misused to enlist non-Sikhs as voters for the Gurdwara
elections. With this introduction, SGPC demanded from Government of
India that since there are virtually no Sehajdharis existing
the Sikh Gurdwara Act be amended to include only ‘keshadhari
Sikhs’ as voters.
So much so that Khushwant Singh, the renowned scholar who
himself does not follow rahit, writes truthfully about the
importance of hair. He simply echoes the views of SGPC,
The absorption of the sahajdhari Sikhs into the Hindu fold adds weight to
the argument that there is no such thing as a clean-shaven Sikh. At
one time sahajdhari Sikhism was – as the meaning of the word
signified, “those who take time” –the half way house to the hirsute
(keshadhari) form of Khalsa Sikhism. Now the process is reversed,
and it has become a halfway house to Hinduism.
(A History of the Sikhs – Khushwant Singh
p.305)
|
At the time of partition in 1947,a visionary Master Tara Singh
had lamented: “Now that the Britishers are leaving, I am
frightened.” He said till now any Sikh, even worst type of a
traitor, could not claim to be an angrez, but now it will take
only two minutes for him to join the bandwagon of ruling class.
How prophetic he was has been proved beyond doubt when such an
affidavit is being submitted by SGPC |
|
The 1973 General House resolution of the SGPC was pursued
vigorously by SGPC and ultimately Government of India concurring
with and accepting the demand of the SGPC disfranchised
Sehajdharis by Notification No. S.O.1190(E) Dt. 8th October,
2003. It took thirty long years and efforts of the entire Panth
which brought fruits and long-awaited demand of the Panth was
accepted.
At the time of
enactment of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, SGPC itself contributed
its mite in getting the definition of Sikh adapted by the Parliament
which made it mandatory for a Sikh to be Keshadhari. While
accepting the draft of All India Sikh Gurdwara Act, SGPC General
House adopted the Delhi definition of a Sikh.
Playing its pivotal role in protecting the kakars
world over, SGPC had been sending delegations all over the world and
raising its voice vociferously. But it is intriguing as to what new
facts have dawned on the SGPC now that they have filed an affidavit
reversing their own stand and nullifying the achievement of
disfranchising the so called Sahajdharis.
Khushwant Singh in his book A History of the Sikhs
had analysed and suggested the way to maintain the entity and
identity,
……….the only chance of survival of the Sikhs as a separate community is
to create a state in which they form a compact group, where the
teaching of gurmukhi and the Sikh religion is compulsory, and where
there is an atmosphere of respect for the traditions of their Khalsa
forefathers.
This was the
reason of the demand for the state of Punjabi Suba. But tragedy is
that not only both the parameters analysed and suggested by
Khushwant Singh have not been achieved even despite getting the
state of Punjabi Suba, rather motion has been set to reverse the
process of negating the gains achieved with great sacrifices of our
forefathers.
Mansur-Al-Hallaj
was ordered to be stoned to death. Every inhabitant of the town was
asked to throw a stone at him. When stones were hitting Mansur, he
was laughing. Shibli, one of his closest disciples, got frightened
and instead threw a rose at his Master. When the rose hit Mansur he
started crying. Shibli ran to Mansur and said he had simply thrown a
rose at him. Mansur told Shibli that the others were innocent and
ignorant but he was not. “Others’ stones have hurt my body but
your rose has hurt my heart.”
SGPC’s present
stance of voluntarily agreeing to grant status of Sahajdhari
Sikhs to those who continue to shave and trim is much more
heinous than this proverbial act of Shibli. Shibli was under threat
and compulsion. What is the compulsion of the SGPC is a matter of
intrigue.
If at all the
SGPC’s latest stand with reference to Sikh Gurdwara Act that a
person who continues to shave and trim is a Sahajdhari Sikh
is not foiled, the future of the panth is anybody’s guess.
The author is
editor of community journal Sant Sipahi. Any correspondence,
criticism, appreciation, reactions to this article can be sent to
worldsikhnews@gmail.com and will be routed to him. – Ed.
| |
High Court asks SGPC whether a person cutting his hair or
shaving is a Sehajdhari Sikh?
12.05.1938 - Resolution of SGPC says –
No!
26.11.2008 - Expert Panel recommendation says – No!!
03.12.2008 - Executive Committee of SGPC says –
No!!!
04.12.2008 - Expert Panel again says –
No!!!!
But
05.12.2008 - SGPC Affidavit says
– YES
|
|
17 December
2008
|