because the truth needs to be told

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Sikh MPs protest at calling 1857 uprising as 'First War of Independence'; BJP upset
WSN Network

New Delhi: In the presence of the President of India, the Vice-President, the Prime Minister and Lok Sabha Speaker, and right in the Central Hall of Indian Parliament, four Sikh MPs got up, led by Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker Charanjit Singh Atwal, disputing the nomenclature of 1857 uprising as the first war of Independence and demanding that the First Anglo-Sikh War of 1845 should be seen as the first war of independence.

As Indian Parliament convened a joint session on May 10 to mark the 150th anniversary of the 1857 uprising, the four MPs -- Atwal, Rattan Singh Ajnala, Veerendra Singh Bajwa (both Akali Dal) and Tarlochan Singh (Independent) -- disputed the date of the beginning of the war of independence and said it began much earlier to 1857.

The BJP, which has an alliance with the Akali Dal in Punjab, has taken exception to Atwal's remarks.

"We have objected to the fact that the 1857 uprising has been called the First War of Indian Independence. That is absolutely wrong. It is historically wrong and we seem to have forgotten our heroes who fought the British long before 1857. It is total disrespect for them," Tarlochan Singh later told the waiting media.

The MPs said the 1845 Anglo-Sikh War, led by Sikh General Sham Singh Attariwala, should be treated as the First War of Independence, instead of the revolt of 1857.

Tarlochan Singh, in his article published by the WSN in its Dec 6- 12, 2006 issue, had said. "We should be very clear about the enemy against whom the war is being waged. For example, the Sikh Misl specialised in waging guerrilla warfare against scourges from the West like Nadir Shah or Abdali, who would invade India and take away Indian women in the thousands, to be sold in the streets of Basra. And Sikh guerrillas would harass them right up to the Attock (Indus) to recover as many Indian women as they could and then try to restore those unfortunate women to their families. Now, what war were they waging? Evidently, a war of independence!"

The Indian uprising of 1857 was a prolonged period of armed encounters in different parts of the country against British colonialists.

The Akali view has not gone down well with the ally BJP which has maintained that the summer battle triggered by the sepoys’ march from Meerut to Delhi was indeed the First War of Independence. The SGPC president Avtar Singh Makkar has backed Atwal's view.

Incidentally, Sham Singh Attariwala remains much ignored even in Punjab and the regime of Capt Amarinder Singh was the first one to celebrate the anniversary of Attariwala in any fitting manner.

16 May, 2007 
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious
Google  
 
  Read Also
  Looking Back a Hundred Years’ of Mutiny of 1857
The First War Ever? 
 Purja Purja Kat Mare... 
 1857 And  the Sikhs 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
The First Anglo-Sikh War (1845-46)
150 Years Anniversary Celebrations of 1857
December 11, 1845 — First Anglo-Sikh war
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
Submit Photo
Submit a Letter  
Submit Feedback
 

 

 

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas