because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Sumedh Saini case twist reveals judge-accused nexus
WSN Network

New Delhi: A kidnapping case against Punjab IGP Sumedh Singh Saini and three other police officials has taken a dramatic turn, with the mother of one of the victims alleging a judge-accused nexus.  

Saini and three other Punjab police officials are facing criminal proceedings in a case in which three people went missing from a Ludhiana police station 14 years ago.

Amar Kaur, mother of one of the victims, Vinod Kumar, has written to Delhi High Court’s judge Justice Sunil Gaur that she doesn’t have faith in him and he should recuse himself from the case. Kaur has send the copies of the letter to the Chief Justice of India as well as Chief Justice of the Delhi HC.  

According to Kaur, who sent the letter on January 2, the judge and the accused hailed from Chandigarh, were classmates in a master’s course in history at Panjab University, Chandigarh and “were presumably good friends”. To back her claim, Kaur attached a copy of the result sheet.

Mother of a victim has told the judge he was classmate of Saini, so she has no faith in him. Saini seems to have changed tack once this judge came on scene

 

Kaur, who is 91, alleged that a bias in favour of Saini was “apparent” and the fact that they were classmates was revealed in an enquiry conducted by her later. Justice Gaur, who had reserved the verdict on Saini’s petition on November 27, has now posted the case for “re-hearing” on February 26, a strong indication that he could recuse himself.

Earlier another judge was hearing the case. Kaur's letter alleged that after the matter was transferred to Justice Gaur, “the strategy of the accused took a new turn and it seemed that the judge wanted to finish the matter quickly. After a brief argument only on a point of sanction of case of Saini, the case was reserved for orders. There was an urgency to dispose of the matter. It was only due to the resistance by CBI and the complainant’s counsel that the matter was not disposed of.”

Courtesy HT

14 January 2009
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
 
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
Submit Photo
Submit a Letter  
Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas