because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Kis Bidh Ruli PatShahi: A Review
Raghbir Singh Dhillon reviews the second book in
Ajmer Singh's ongoing work on contemporary Sikh history

Raghbir Singh Dhillon 

This is the second of the trilogy, fourth edition of the first having appeared on the bookstalls last year. Third book is under preparation and may soon be in the hands of the readers. The first book, as its title indicates, relates to the 100 years of slavery of the Sikhs from 1849 to 1947 under British rule. I would like the readers to keep one thing in mind that these two books are not the whole story of the title of the second book.

The author would be doing a great service to the Panth if in a fourth book of the series he takes up the happenings of the period starting with Banda Singh Bahadur’s departure from Deccan to Punjab till 1849 with special references to the establishment of Sarkare Khalsa on 27th May, 1710, its constitution, administrative set up, role of sections opposing that set up, his execution, the rise of small groups later turning into misals culminating in Maharaja Ranjit Singh establishing his Raj because these events form a very crucial part of the story of ‘How the Patshahi of Sikh Concept,’ said to be actually  founded by Banda Singh Bahadur was attempted to be finished and what efforts were made to obliterate it from the Sikh memory by the forces at work at that time.

The author in the one under review describes how the Sikh leaders and other intellectuals including Marxists got exploited by the clever moves of the managers of Indian Independence Movement who preached Indian Nationalism on the model of its concept in the Western and Latin America countries at the of end of colonial period hastened by the defeat of fascist forces in the Second World War. While doing so they put aside the urge for Independence of their own nation which had grown in them over the years as a result of Sikh teachings and further kept alive through well worded Ardas (religious prayer) which apart from the prologue of Sikh theme, describes the historical period of their unparalleled martyrdoms for Sikh cause and reminds them of their aspirations for spiritual and political ascendancy.

The author has very successfully brought out by examples the character of moneyed classes who pay only lip service to the religion and in practice throw to winds all the norms necessary for the growth of a vibrant, soulful and respectable nation. Some Sikhs may frown at the author’s citation of the case of founder of Patiala State, Baba Ala, who presented himself as Chaudhary to Mughals and as Singh to Sikh powers in his communications with them. While doing so he was not displaying the character of a true Sikh who becomes ‘Nirbhau and Nirveir even while using his political sagacity. He may have done some service to the Sikh institutions, not entirely out of love for Sikhism but to camouflage his other anti-gurmit activities to escape the wrath of Sikhs.

The lure of enviable high positions enjoyed by Sikhs in the British regime in civil and military ranks because of their earlier positions under their own rule or because of valour shown in the Anglo-Sikh Wars due to their religious dedication, led them to walk into the trap of nationalism of Hindu majority community at the time of Partition. Although their leaders refused to endorse the Constitution of Republic of India for its failure to safeguard the Sikh interests, they forgot it in view of the greed of sharing benefits accruing from independence although discriminated in various hidden and visible ways.

Sikhs lost their empire to British which they had carved out in Punjab, the land of their Gurus where everybody had full freedom to observe his faith and live dignified life after a long struggle against the entrenched forces of Muslim Shariat autocracy and aggressive Hindu chauvinism. There was no interference in their faith in that colonial regime. Rather they were encouraged to observe it with full devotion to Guru Granth Sahib and in the maintenance of their physical appearance so long as this devotion did not pose any danger to their suzerainty. To a great extent they were safe from the Muslim and Hindu dominance in the matter of their religious, social and political rights.

But in the period starting 1947 they started facing not only increasing interference in their religious affairs, their rights of a free citizen also got overshadowed by the ruthless majority who was looking forward to wreak vengeance on them since their caste-based hegemony was challenged by the Sikh Gurus advocating casteless society of equality, fraternity and freedom of religion with malice towards none.

The elite Sikhs who enjoyed a sort of feudal life in pre-Partition days were content if more or less similar kind of life they could lead even as second rate citizens in their own country. In their lust for money and other privileges usually available to slaves, they threw to winds the Sikh maxim ‘all comforts are useless if dignified living is not available’. Because of this degradation they faced unprecedented humiliation at the time of Asian Games in 1982.

The author has extensively quoted statements of many Sikh intellectuals as well as British and Hindu writers in support of his claims about the political ignorance and diluted faithfulness for Sikh Faith of Sikh leaders. Whenever they, ignoring the requirements and aspirations of the Sikhs as nation, made statements favouring the concept of State and Nationalism of majority Hindu community, they were not only praised but also supported to the hilt by Hindus so as to sabotage the Sikh aspirations of a nation and agenda of casteless society. He refers to Arun Shourie who in 1982 wrote many provocative articles against Sikhs. Further he mentions an Urdu Daily from Delhi whose editor Jai Parkash objecting to daily recitation in Gurdwaras of ‘Raj Karege Khalsa’ vomited his venom as under in its issue dated 7-12-1985:

 “Ordinarily the enemies of country are blown off by guns; their heads are cut off; their very existence is annihilated; …..but we in India continue to hear for many years this rubbish talk of ‘Raj Karega Khalsa’. What to speak of cutting their heads, we have not been able to cut their tongues even to completely incapacitate them from making such foolish announcements”.

He quotes Harinder Singh Mehboob from his ‘Sehje Racheo Khalsa’ page 691 as follows:
 “ Hindus first pointed out the similarities between Hindu cults and names mentioned in Gurbani with the Sikh Thought; then they planted them in the Sikh psyche and ultimately made the Sikh Consciousness slave of their outer appearances….This affected the thinking of hundreds of English knowing Sikh intellectuals of 20th century including S. Kapur Singh ICS who tried to explain the nuances of spiritual lessons of Gurbani in the light of outer appearance of Hindu cults and names.”

In this regard he quotes Kapur Singh from his ‘Parasaraprasna’ p.254 as writing, “The Constitution introduced in 1950 is based on the Sikh postulates.”

In the last chapter of this book the author refers to Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala as the first Sikh leader who realizing the miserable position of Sikhs under the second era of their slavery in their own land of Gurus declared, “We are slaves in India; we have to remove it to live”. He supports the Sant by quoting King Martin Luther Junior as saying, “Slavery disfigures the soul and ruins the personality.”  In the words of Harinder Singh Mehboob “The blood of self-respect has dried in the veins of political leaders of Sikhs”.

As about failure of the Sant to accomplish this colossal task the author sums up by writing that the time at his disposal was too short-from 1982 to only June 1984 and according to Law of Gravity a leader, howsoever, capable he may be can change the society to a certain extent only but not completely for which continued and sustained efforts for years are required (as was in the case of Sikh Gurus who took more than 200 years). He believes that in future whenever the Sikhs will face extremely grim situation, springs of love would automatically gush out from their hearts for their marvelous general (Jarnail) and the entire Sikh nation would loudly cry ‘Bhindranwala’. 

Raghbir Singh Dhillon can be reached at raghbirsinghdhillon@yahoo.com.

13 August, 2008
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
  Kis Bidh Ruli Patshahi: Quest for Glory of the Khalsa
  Academic Rigours & the Tragedy of Lost...
 
Intellectuals Mull over Whither Went Sovereignty?
 
Academic Rigours & the Tragedy of Lost Sovereignty
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
Submit Photo
Submit a Letter  
Submit Feedback
 
s
s

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas