because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

India's top Human Rights panel is headless, in many senses of the term
WSN Network

NEW DELHI: The non-seriousness of New Delhi about its human rights record is clear from te fact that its top human rights protection body, the National Human Rights Commission, is not only headless but is likely to remain that way for quite some time now. Ever since Justice S. Rajendra Babu retired on May 31, there has been no move to even select another person even though such action could have been taken months in advance. Former Supreme Court judge, Justice G.P. Mathur, is a stop gap arrangement because the Protection of Human Rights Act,1993 specifies that the NHRC chairperson “shall be a person who has been a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.”

Since as per the Act, the retired chief justice of India should not be more than 70 years of age, there is another problem. Of all the former chief justices of India, who are alive, there are only two who are below 70. The government, however, seems to have decided against both of them. Former CJI R.C. Lahoti will turn 70 in November next year, while Justice Y. K. Sabharwal is just 67, but were ruled out.

The allegations of corruption against Justice Sabharwal put him out of the race, while proximity of Justice Lahoti with a particular political party sealed his fate. In the given circumstances, the earliest the government can hope to get a regular NHRC chief would be in May next year, when the incumbent CJI K.G. Balakrishnan retires from the Supreme Court. But it is not known whether Justice Balakrishnan would be even interested in accepting the post.

Human Rights activists said it was possible to amend the 1993 Human Rights Act to allow retired Supreme Court judges to head the commission. However, the possibility of such a step being taken appears bleak.

Former CJI Justice J.S Verma who also served as the NHRC chief between 2000 and 2003, expressed surprise at the commission being rendered headless. “Such an important institution in these days, when the human rights occupy a central place in democracies across the world, should not be neglected,” he said.

1 July 2009
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
 
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
 
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
  Submit News
  Submit Announcements
  Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter  
  Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas