|
Dera and The Indian State
As
the hour of CBI charge-sheet was approaching, Sauda Dera’s
activities too doubled up. A so-called open letter to Guru Gobind
Singh was released to the media, its contents being largely a repeat
of earlier press notes denying any wrong doing; but still
apologizing in the interest of peace. The dera head, in an effort to
win sympathy of masses and the court, complained that Sikhs were
forcing Dalits and Hindus to commit acts of self-immolation. Gurmeet
Ram Rahim has administered to thousands his Jaam-e-Insa concoction,
yet only Aditya (Arora) Insaan is being projected as the finest
specimen of his creation. He is a mouthpiece of Gurmeet Ram who is
either expressing his master’s messages as he directly receives, or
ineptly communicates to the media about Dera’s views. After four
months of stand off between Sikhs and Dera, Aditya’s denial of
placing an advertisement in the newspapers has come as a rude shock
to all who were involved in conflict resolution. Who did place the
advertisement then? The enquiry may reveal the wider spectrum of
secret deal (saudebaazi) with politicians of many shades.
The day Punjab Police performed its
ritual of arresting and releasing the dera head in a highly
conciliatory situation, there were more than 26,000 followers ready
to follow the directions of their master. Dera’s militia did not
allow the entire police team to enter the Gufa; only few policemen
were allowed. It appears as if the dera head’s political links got
jammed either due to exaggerated interest of media along with a
highly charged campaign of Sikh bodies to arraign him or due to the
pressure of UPA allies such as left parties. On July 31, 2007, the
CBI submitted its report of his involvement in rape of Saadhvis and
murder cases of a former Dera manager and a journalist. The dera
chief has been directed to be present in the court on August 31.
Only time will tell how CBI will be able to withstand pressure of
Congress leadership to indict Gurmeet Ram Rahim in double murder and
rape cases.
Dera Sauda controversy was following the
same route that was chalked out for it by the con artists, but it
backfired; it happened mainly because the ‘information revolution’
at the outset of 21st century is phenomenal.
Government’s control on media in the 70’s and 80’s deprived the
people of the truth behind the scene. The course of the Nirankari
confrontation with Sikhs in 1978 had derailed Jayaparkash Narayan’s
vision of pluralistic strong India. The turning point in Indian
politics lost its charm against staged-up campaign of terrorism and
separatism. At the height of melodrama, major political parties
rallied round nationalistic goals of defeating
terrorism and
anti-national activities. Indira Gandhi symbolized bulwark against
sedition. Left parties gave up their commitment to uplift the
downtrodden and came to the forefront to assist Indira Gandhi in
teaching Punjab a lesson. BJP aided and abetted in suppressing the
militancy in whatever manner it was possible, even though
extrajudicial means had to be used. Splintered groups of old Janta
Dal had no choice except to follow Indira Gandhi’s grand design. To
the amusement of Congress(I), the Blue Star operation in 1984 had
laid the foundation of Congress’s indispensability for two decades.
The mutual opposition of all political parties had neutralized in
the case of Punjab. Congress had secured secret mandate of all
political parties to use torture and trauma to suppress the voice
that sought justice within the perimeters of Indian constitution.
The bloodshed of several thousand people on both sides of the fence
weakened India of freedom fighters’ dreams. The perfidy against
Punjab by some hind-sighted Pundits in government of India’s elite
agency (Research and Analysis Wing) had demoralized and demonized
Sikhs who had earlier defended its borders at times when most others
chose to side with the aggressors. The same kind finds now it
convenient to act patriotic and condemn Sikhs as separatists.
Dera Sauda controversy has been paying dividends in the manner of
magnetizing estranged Hindus to the Congress nucleus. BJP’s
cautious warnings to the four months old Badal government is an
expression of nervousness about its eroding base . Professor
Rajinder Bhandari’s cries are simply to placate fears of Hindu
community. The CPI(M)’s outcry that Badal government is violating
the Premis’ right to worship is also to solidify and secure
support among Dalits and downtrodden. The BSP too has an eye on the
same bastion. Siding with the Congress is a politically savvy choice
of Mayawati to mainly stay in power in the most populated state of
India.
The
political history of independent India is replete with glaring
examples of irregularities in the electoral process. The indictment
of Indira Grandhi by Allahabad High court judgment in 1975 had
enraged her so much that she arbitrarily clamped Emergency without
even taking her cabinet into confidence.
In
60 years of independence. Vajpayee is the only non-Congress premier
who could complete a five year term. Morarji Desai’s government
collapsed in less than two and a half years while the rest of the
non-Congress regimes at the Center could not complete even one year.
In three years time, India saw six Prime Ministers who struggled to
get the honorific by hook and crook. The statistics prove that
Congress specializes in turning the tide against political rivals
and using them for ulterior motives. How far other political parties
will allow Congress to make them instruments of its design will
decide the future of this country.
Post emergency Congress politics is heavily focused on Punjab. The
bugbear of terrorism and Pakistan’s intrusion was the best bet for
Indira Gandhi to regain lost power after the Emergency. Morarji was
installed as Prime Minister yet the bureaucracy was still devoted to
Indira. The machinations of intelligence and loyal bureaucrats had
planted mines in Janta Dal’s foundation. The explosion brought
Morarji’s government down and the Congress extended unconditional
support to Chaudary Charan Singh and his Lok Dal. A single stroke
had knocked the JP’s revolution into smithereens.
The
speciality in engineering troubles in hot spots of political
relations should be seen in this context: Dera Sauda vs Sikhs;
Gujjar vs Mina clashes, and posters of politicians in guise of Hindu
gods and goddesses. These may have some common connections to
achieve the same goal. Mainstream Hindu and Dalit votes in favor of
Congress will erode BJP and BSP base. The Congress Juggernaut has
already botched the left movement mainly to West Bengal and Kerala.
When Congress used to have more than two third majority in Lok
Sabha, the leader of the party imposed his/her will on the
government, legislature and judiciary. The leader was able to
justify his/her agenda by giving unilateral explanations. But in
days of coalition politics, Pundits have proposed legislation to
grant sweeping powers to the Central government to decimate any
elected government in states. If that happens, we will see another
phase of undeclared Emergency in the country. The Commission on
Center-State Relations under the chairmanship of former Chief
Justice of India MM Punchi is to reduce states virtually as colonies
of the Hindu state.The writ of the Center will run through
bureaucrats. The staged up terrorism and sedition will again
escalate the fears of 1 billion population. A radical leader is
bound to emerge in such circumstances. The Congress will try to gain
popularity by eliminating such a leader and then by enacting itself
as the Savior of India. How far this will go? The treacherous design
may not succeed always. The change is bound to come that will
replace the decadent and degenerated structure with the one that
will provide space for all to relish life.
1 August, 2007
|